Top    a_lob_a01

title A01
source Press: reportage
taken from Lancaster-Oslo-Bergen corpus of modern English (LOB) : [tagged, horizontal format] / Stig Johansson (http://ota.ox.ac.uk/desc/0167)
terms of use Distributed by the University of Oxford under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

1‘Stop electing life peers’.
2By Trevor Williams.
3A move to stop Mr Gaitskell from nominating any more labour life peers is to be made at a meeting of labour MPs tomorrow.
4Mr Michael Foot has put down a resolution on the subject and he is to be backed by Mr Will Griffiths, MP for Manchester Exchange.
5Though they may gather some left-wing support, a large majority of labour MPs are likely to turn down the Foot-Griffiths resolution.
6‘Abolish Lords’.
7Mr Foot's line will be that as labour MPs opposed the government bill which brought life peers into existence, they should not now put forward nominees.
8He believes that the House of Lords should be abolished and that labour should not take any steps which would appear to ‘prop up’ an out-dated institution.
9Since 1958, 13 labour life peers and peeresses have been created.
10Most labour sentiment would still favour the abolition of the House of Lords, but while it remains labour has to have an adequate number of members.
11Africans drop rivalry to fight Sir Roy.
12By Dennis Newson.
13The two rival African nationalist parties of Northern Rhodesia have agreed to get together to face the challenge from Sir Roy Welensky, the federal Premier.
14Delegates from Mr Kenneth Kaunda's united national independence party (280,000 members) and Mr Harry Nkumbula's African national congress (400,000) will meet in London today to discuss a common course of action.
15Sir Roy is violently opposed to Africans getting an elected majority in Northern Rhodesia, but the colonial Secretary, Mr Iain Macleod, is insisting on a policy of change.
16Sir Roy's united federal party is boycotting the London talks on the protectorate's future.
17Said Mr Nkumbula last night:
18‘We want to discuss what to do if the British government gives in to Sir Roy and the talks fall through.
19There are bound to be demonstrations.’
20All revealed.
21Yesterday Sir Roy's chief aide, Mr Julius Greenfield, telephoned his chief a report on his talks with Mr Macmillan at Chequers.
22Mr Macleod went on with the conference at Lancaster House despite the crisis which had blown up.
23He has now revealed his full plans to the Africans and liberals attending.
24These plans do not give the Africans the overall majority they are seeking.
25African delegates are studying them today.
26The conference will meet to discuss the function of a proposed House of Chiefs.
27No secret talks — Macleod.
28By Hugh Pilcher.
29Mr Iain Macleod, the colonial Secretary, denied in the Commons last night that there have been secret negotiations on Northern Rhodesia's future.
30The Northern Rhodesia conference in London has been boycotted by the two main settlers' parties — the united federal party and the dominion party.
31But representatives of Sir Roy Welensky, Prime Minister of the central African federation, went to Chequers at the week-end for talks with Mr Macmillan.
32Northern Rhodesia is a member of the federation.
33Mr Macleod was not at the week-end meeting.
34But he told MPs yesterday: ‘I have no knowledge of secret negotiations.’
35He said Britain had an obligation to consult the federal government.
36But the final decision remained with the British government.
37Mr James Callaghan, labour's colonial spokesman, said Sir Roy had no right to delay progress in the talks by refusing to sit round the conference table.
38Mr Macleod thought the two Rhodesian parties had refused to attend the talks because Sir Roy had found messages sent from the government were ‘unsatisfactory.’
39African delegates to the talks yesterday called on Mr Macmillan to cease his negotiations with Sir Roy's representative, Mr Julius Greenfield.
40He was at Chequers last week-end.
41They said they regarded with ‘growing anger’ the ‘gross and unconstitutional’ interference by Sir Roy's federal government in the talks.
42Informal talks at Lancaster House will resume today.
43Deep south smears Jack's negro.
44President Kennedy today defended the appointment of a negro as his housing Minister.
45It has aroused strong opposition from the anti-Negro senators of the deep south.
46The negro is Mr Robert Weaver of New York.
47One of his tasks will be to see there is no racial discrimination in government and state housing projects.
48Senator Allen Ellender, of Louisiana, sparked off the opposition by telling a television audience it was ‘current Washington gossip’ that Weaver once had communist affiliations.
49A letter.
50The Senate banking committee, which is headed by another southern Senator — Willis Robertson, of Virginia — met today in closed session to discuss Weaver's appointment.
51Senator Robertson later disclosed he had sent a letter to Mr Kennedy saying he had received several complaints about Weaver's loyalty.
52He said these concerned Mr Weaver's alleged association with organisations black-listed by the government.
53Immediately Mr Kennedy rushed a letter to Senator Robertson saying the federal bureau of investigation had reported on Mr Weaver.
54He believed he would perform ‘outstanding service’ in his post.
55Senator Robertson's committee has to pass Mr Weaver's nomination before it can be considered by the full Senate.
56Gold-hunting Kennedy shocks Dr A.
57Germany must pay.
58Offer of <pound>357 m is too small.
59President Kennedy is ready to get tough over West Germany's cash offer to help America's balance of payments position.
60He said bluntly in Washington yesterday that the offer — <pound> 357 million — was not good enough.
61And he indicated that his government would try to get Germany to pay more.
62He did not mention personal talks with Dr Adenauer, the West German Chancellor.
63But he said discussions ‘on a higher level than in the past’ might be useful.
64The President will probably discuss the problem with Dr Brentano, the West German foreign Minister, who is due in Washington next week.
65A big slice of Germany's ‘aid’ is the early payment of a <pound> 210 million debt to America.
66United States officials quickly point out that this is money due to America anyway.
67And they are unimpressed by the Germans' claim that they can not pay more than <pound> 357 million without upsetting their own economy.
68The Americans say Germany is having it too good and is not paying for the past or for the present.
69Tough spot.
70The Adenauer government flatly rejected attempts by the Eisenhower government to get them to pay a regular sum towards the cost of keeping American troops in Germany.
71These support costs are a big drain on America's dollar reserves.
72Dr Adenauer's answer is the once-and-for-all cash offer of <pound> 357 million.
73President Kennedy's rejection of it is a painful blow to the West German government.
74It will now have to pay more — and increase taxation to do so — or run the obvious risks in upsetting the new American administration.
75And, since this is election year in West Germany, Dr Adenauer is in a tough spot.
76Waiting.
77Joyce Egginton cables:
78President Kennedy at his Washington press conference admitted he did not know whether America was lagging behind Russia in missile power.
79He said he was waiting for his senior military aides to come up with the answer on February 20.
80This surprising statement was a sharp about-face from his warnings during the presidential election campaign.
81He claimed slackness in the Eisenhower administration had caused America to lag behind Russia in nuclear development.
82President Kennedy did his best to avoid giving pressmen a direct answer.
83Horrified.
84That's a tory doctor's reaction to the new health charges, says George Brown.
85‘Probe the drug profits and don't take it out of mothers and children’.
86By Hugh Pilcher.
87Two men who are poles apart in personality last night dominated parliament's fiercest battle since the 1959 election — Mr George Brown and Mr Enoch Powell, the health Minister.
88Mr Brown, passionate and warm-hearted, led labour's attack on the higher health charges.
89Mr Powell, white-faced and outwardly unemotional, replied with a statistical statement — and ended by inciting labour MPs to angry uproar.
90One dealt with the human issue behind the health service; the other tried to show that the balance-sheet must always come first.
91The result of the vote was not in doubt.
92For the tories were massed in answer to their whips to defeat a censure motion on the government for ‘undermining the health service’ and placing heavy burdens on those least able to bear them.
93Mr Brown declared that the policy under censure was monstrous.
94It had offended many people far beyond the ranks of labour supporters.
95The press, many doctors and public were denouncing the proposals.
96The letter.
97He quoted from this letter which Mr Gaitskell had received:
98‘My background is a doctor of 68, who has practised medicine for 43 years, chiefly as a panel doctor.
99‘I am a lifelong conservative.
100I am horrified and amazed by my party's proposal to prostitute the whole principle of the state service and to render that service a hardship to poor people.
101‘After a lifetime of helping others and healing the sick, my considered opinion is that anybody supporting the increased charges is a wicked, old —.’
102Mr Brown went on:
103‘We are dealing with a noble edifice which needs an imaginative architect to improve it, but it has got a quantity surveyor.
104We have descended from the real problems to fiddling about with bills of cost.
105‘We believe that a comprehensive medical service, free to the patient at the point of need and with one standard for all sick people, is good and attainable.’
106Different.
107‘We remain for it.
108But the tories never were.’
109Interrupted by angry tories, Mr Brown retorted: ‘The jackals bay when there is nothing better they can do.’
110He told them that their conception of social services was wholly different — fundamentally different from that of labour.
111They would provide an ambulance service for the absolutely wretched — but it would not be too comfortable nor too easy to get.
112Answering jeers that it was labour which first put a ceiling on health spending and started charges, Mr Brown reminded the hostile government benches that was done in 1950 because of the financial strain of the Korean war.
113In fact, the tories made it worse now for the sick and needy than labour had to make it in 1950.
114And as a percentage of social service expenditure, health had fallen from 28.5 to 23.1 per cent.
115Then Mr Brown swung his attack directly to the unsmiling Mr Powell.
116He demanded that instead of taking it out of the patients Mr Powell should take ruthless action against the drug making industry, whose profits had risen by up to 400 per cent in the last eight years.
117‘Mr Powell finds it easier to take it out of mothers, children and sick people than to take on this vast industry,’ Mr Brown commented icily.
118‘Let us have a full inquiry into the cost of drugs and the pharmaceutical industry.’
119The health of children today owed much to the welfare food scheme.
120It was maintained during the war.
121Now in conditions of tory affluence it seemed it could not be carried on.
122When Mr Brown sat down labour MPs cheered for a full minute — and even his bitterest opponents on defence joined in.
123The choice.
124Mr Powell devoted half his speech to giving details of plans for improving the hospital service, on which indeed the government is making progress.
125His basic defence of the health service cuts was that ‘even after the proposed changes the net cost of the service to the exchequer will have increased over three years by 20 per cent.
126‘That can not continue without either development being limited or an adjustment being made in financing.’
127The government decided to adjust the financing — which Mr Powell claimed was underpinning — not undermining — the service.
128Answering the attack on ‘economic charges’ for welfare foods, Mr Powell said that all these foods would still be free in families receiving regular national assistance grants.
129Of the doubled prescription charge his argument was:
130‘It is ludicrous exaggeration to say that by and large a 2 s charge is any more of a burden than a 1 s charge was in 1949.’
131‘Resign’.
132Uproar from the labour side grew as Mr Powell made more and more claims with which MPs disagreed.